Sandman of your toolbox!

Remember watching this one @Rise of guardians released late part of November 2012 dreamworks considering release of part 2 later of 2020 pushed back till later in 2021 now.

I found this movie called by DreamWorks might well be an easy indicator for some to recognize. the story depicts an aspect of the psyche assisting itself in 3D, whilst battling with a polar opposite of itself. As 3D is a premise of experiencing multidimensional states i a few years later found this movie quite interesting. It exposes and highlights 'what can look at itself is not one', and so is also co creating desire to be one. Life is composed of mirrors one being the mirror before the mirror and after the mirror, but also whilst being aware that when observing the ideal of subject of the self in a standard household mirror one is quite easily able to see transparency or you disappear and so the ideal of self identity is transcending the masc u line within or the masc u line that has been superimposed upon you by another not diving in taking responsibility of false identity.

It is also the depiction of the polarity of light and dark or the composing of con choices itself. through a crystalized composition of self projected upon another being real and then denouncing the shadow of itself it doesn't see as it perceives its self as a saint the polarities of saint and sinner yet a sin is a sign of the very distortion. whilst one projects itself as being right and another being bad is simply the ideal of another not aware or feeling whole in a constant whirled or world of cycling itself. as one except the ideals of self illusions or projected manipulated self illusions sees that not only does light serve dark and the false light of itself and the fraud dream time one is experiencing of itself, or the aspect of dream DR I Am, I am needing to doctor my self with a prescription, a script of being in a distorted version of self. where did the ideal of needing to dr myself come from aware that this is a distortion of the mind. Once reaching within the infinite well storehouse of self this way is able to transcend the sandman attempting to fix something that not only doesn't exist but also doesn't belong to the self its is a prescript or story... store rays of light it has composed of itself.. creating fear or false evidence appearing real of itself therefore fearing acceptance of itself. Hence when you see past the density of light one is no longer creating geodes. geodes created with crystalized energetic version of self. once self has a crystalized version ideal or feeling of itself it also seeks to resolve having crystalized itself from matter of solidity to freeform. Also projecting that the other is an anti Christ as being evil when the very ideal come from with the projecting source has of itself, not recognizing the gift of the anti Christ is an version of self that is aware of anti crystallization wholeness of itself and the unwholeness false concept one has of itself, it is also showing up as a guidance consciousness connection point for another to evolve from. the projection of one being evil by the very concept that their own subconscious is ill or distorted, and whilst it keeps running the same script of itself rather than choosing another infinite possible or perspective of self reflection rather than mutating itself.

Mutation and change is maintained as the perpetual rhythm of Dream, mutations in meaning generated by the play of signifiers that produce it. Further, and in relation to the notion of God in Sandman and its very idea of center, it would appear that neither Dream nor the Shaper nor any of the Endless family properly represents the singular source of such signification. Similarly, and with regard to Lacan's patriarchal system, it would appear that there is no transcendent signifier in Sandman outside the play of a system of differences. The tension between play and presence. Play is the disruption of presence. The presence of an element is always a signifying and substitutive reference inscribed in a system of differences and the movement of a chain. Play is always play of absence and presence, but if it is to be thought radically, play must be conceived of before the alternative of presence and absence. Being must be conceived as presence or absence on the basis of the possibility of play and not the other way around.

Such affirmations of self is also afformation's of self... I am Being_______Now ,.... so one thinks so it is.

The reader you are of yourself,.. or re adder.. of your spectrum body indicators can continually absorb the condensed/displaced dreams/realities of characters and subject them to her/his own interpretation. Moreover, with the manifest content always available, it is possible for the reader to return to the site of the dream and extrapolate ever-richer latent content from the manifest material, and also return to before the dream. The experience invariably is one in which contradiction is established as the plane of interpretation so that all further interpretations are profoundly aware of what they elide. Meaning, as it were, exists only as a condition of this grounding difference. it is dependent upon what one choses to own believe or claim as their true premise.

Some often so fragmentary that one's attention is almost exclusively occupied with the search for connections between the fragments; the object of this is not to complicate the spectrum of connections, so much as to make us aware of our own capacity for providing links. In such cases, the text refers back directly to our own preconceptions – which are revealed by the act of interpretation that is a basic element of the reading process. With all literary texts then we may say that the reading process is selective, and the potential text is infinitely richer than any of its individual realizations. This is borne out by the fact that a second reading of a piece of literature often produces a different impression from the first. … Herein lies the dialectical structure of reading. The need to decipher gives us the chance to formulate our own deciphering capacity – i.e., we bring to the fore an element of our being of which we are not directly conscious. The production of the meaning of literary texts does not merely entail the discovery of the unformulated, which can then be taken over by the active imagination of the reader; it also entails the possibility that we may formulate ourselves and so discover what has previously seemed to elude our consciousness. These are the ways in which reading literature gives us the chance to formulate the unformulated.

How being delirious serves being de allured or being told your dis-illusional free from illusions is a complement free from distortions.

Delirium ploughs a similar furrow to Dream in that she is contradictorily coherent and a further example of non-self identical difference. Delirium by her nature is unfixed; in "Brief Lives," she announces she likes "airplanes. I like anywhere that isn't a proper place. I like in-betweens". As a result she and Dream make complementary travel companions in the "Brief Lives" story. Indeed, an example of Dream's perpetual difference is to be found in Delirium's surprise that he will help her find Destruction, (or deconstruction of entanglement of false premises) and all that this will entail for Morpheus. Moreover, he is also different to himself in action such as when he assumes the moral center in agreeing to act as Executor of Hell, (or Heal) and when he is utterly immoral and unethical in his imprisoning of Nada; he speaks, we learn, in the different languages of those to whom he speaks; he is a different god ( or Geode) to different people at different moments in history – Oneiros, Morpheus, the Sandman – and in each incarnation different to himself; in issue by issue of the Sandman series he is a different figure drawn and penciled and coloured by different artists, and his appearance differs from race to race and from historical moment to historical moment. He is the site of infinite play, despite his own dour demeanor, because he is the fluidity and unfixity of dreams themselves. Ultimately he is a littoral being on whom is based the interplay of dreams and reality transcending itself.

By Michelle Mann